Economic repatriation refers to a company`s process of recovering profits in its own country. There are four main methods of repatriation: dividends and profits, royalties, service management fees and intercompany loans. [16] Direct managers and staff often notice the difficulties associated with repatriation, but are not always able to respond. Budgetary deficiencies and time constraints are often cited as reasons why they are not a priority on the agenda. Solutions to return problems do not have to be costly and can bring great benefits to the business. [Citation required] Basic support can be provided, for example. B, good communication upstream, during and after international deployment or a tutoring program to support repatriation. The expatriate and his family should feel understood by his company. Support can increase job satisfaction and thus protect the company`s investments. [14] In the 20th century, after all the European wars, several repatriation commissions were set up to monitor the return of war refugees, displaced persons and prisoners of war to their countries of origin. In some countries, return hospitals have been set up to meet the persistent medical and health needs of returning military personnel.

In the Soviet Union, refugees, considered traitors to surrender, were often killed or sent to Siberian concentration camps. [10] In the United States, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act came into effect at the end of 2017 and reduced the return tax by 35%. For a limited time, the new law allowed U.S. companies to recover serum money earned abroad at interest rates of only 8%. Return of human remains to their home nation. In the United States, the human remains of Indians are discovered and removed from their graves as part of the process of building or developing the land or as part of archaeological excavations. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990 established the process in which Indian tribes and Hawaiian organizations recognized by the Confederacy may require federal authorities and institutions receiving federal funds to return culturally related human remains. NAGPRA also establishes provisions authorizing the provision of Native American human remains found on federal lands to the affiliated Indian tribe or the Hawaii Indian organization.

NAGPRA does not apply to the Smithsonian Institution, which is covered by the provisions of the National Museum of the American Indian Act of 1989. In previous eras, it was customary for the British colonial authorities to gather heads and other body parts of indigenous peoples, such as the Australian Indians and the Maori, for the exhibition in British museums. The repatriation of these body parts is currently underway. You`ll find an example of successful body return under Yagan. Another example is the hard work of the Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme, established in 2003 in partnership between the Maori and the New Zealand government. The program is run by the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (Te Papa) and has repatriated more than 350 remains of Meori and Moriori to New Zealand since 2003. Article 12 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples reaffirms that indigenous peoples have the right to recover their human remains. The declaration was adopted in September 2007 with the support of 143 countries.