Any agreement entered into by two parties in different countries at the time of the war with another country is considered invalid. The agreements will not enter into force until there is peace between the countries. [2] If a situation arose in which the parties had agreed to the agreement, but the countries were at war at the time of implementation, this would also be invalid and the agreement would be at a standstill. Example: a B paid, a civil servant a certain amount of money that causes him to leave the service, thus paving the way for the appointment of A in his place. The agreement was cancelled. The politics of the law is another name for public order. Public order can be difficult for many people to understand because it does not have a firm legal definition. What is considered public order can change depending on the time and needs of people. Many courts take a conservative view of public order, believing that public order is determined by judicial decisions and laws, not by people`s opinions. If someone finds trade with enemies of the state, he is always considered contrary to public order.

Contracts involving trade with enemies are illegal and will not be enforced by the court. In principle, it is assumed that a contract or act violates public order if it leads to a violation of the law, harms citizens or harms the State. Overall, public order means that courts sometimes invalidate a contract because it is in the public interest. Normally, the role of the court is to enforce contracts, so the negation of contracts based on public order is an exception to their traditional function. Only the courts are competent to interpret public order. It involves the transfer of a public office in return for a specific consideration or the encouragement of civil servants to act for remuneration in cash or in kind. . . .